LawTech.Asia

Asia's Leading Law & Technology Review

Catherine Shen: Legal Tech in China – When “Cheap, Good, Fast” Is Not Always a Trade-Off

Reading time: 8 minutes

Written by Catherine Shen | Edited by Josh Lee Kok Thong

In 2025, the author visited some well-known technology giants and legal tech companies in Beijing and Shenzhen, and conducted background research of the legal tech space in China[1] as part of the trip preparation. The article summarises some key observations and takeaways from that experience. Given the size and diversity of China’s market, any generalisation should be treated with caution. Readers should keep this in mind while reading the article. 

Introduction

At a panel discussion on AI governance attended by the author in November 2025, one speaker (who cannot be named on account of the Chatham House Rule) referenced the common law of business balance “cheap, good, fast: pick two” to describe divergent global approaches to AI governance. Yet this familiar business adage does not always hold true in China. From consumer goods such as running shoes[2] and electric vehicles[3] to advanced technology such as AI models,[4] Chinese companies now routinely deliver products that are affordable, high-quality and rapidly iterated. Chinese brands are no longer dismissed as cheap knockoffs and are giving their established international counterparts a run for the money.[5]

Legal tech is no exception. Traditionally, legal services (not just in China) have been conservative, risk-adverse and harder to commoditise. Thus, it would not be a surprise if the legal industry remained rooted to the cheap-good-fast trade-off.  The legal profession has also been comparatively slower in technology adoption compared to most other industries, at least before the emergence of generative AI. Yet, China’s legal tech scene is vibrant for its breadth of products, technical depth, speed of execution and commercial sophistication. Several structural conditions may have made this possible.

TechLaw.Fest 2025 Quick Chats: Justice Kwek Mean Luck, High Court Judge, Supreme Court of Singapore

Reading time: 11 minutes

Written by Josh Lee Kok Thong

TechLaw.Fest 2025 (“TLF“) took place from 10–11 September 2025, bringing together participants from around the world to engage in leading-edge conversations at the intersection of law, technology, and business. This year, LawTech.Asia had the unique privilege of interviewing the Honourable Justice Kwek Mean Luck, High Court Judge of the Supreme Court of Singapore, Chair of Board of Directors of LawNet Technology Services (“LTS”), and Chair of the Board of Governors of the Singapore Judicial College (“SJC”). Justice Kwek also delivered a Welcome Address on Day 2 of TLF 2025.

Having served with distinction in various roles in public service, Justice Kwek reflected on several areas in this interview: how judges keep up with technological advancements (that may one day raise novel legal issues in the courts); his reflections on the hopes and aspirations of young legal professionals; how young legal professionals can prepare themselves for an AI-first future; and his advice to young legal professionals on building a meaningful and lasting career. 

TechLaw.Fest 2025 Quick Chats: Commissioner John Edwards, Information Commissioner, United Kingdom’s Information Commissioner’s Office

Reading time: 8 minutes

Written by Elizabeth Thomas and Josh Lee Kok Thong

TechLaw.Fest 2025 (“TLF”) took place from 10 to 11 September 2025, bringing together participants from around the world to engage in leading-edge conversations at the intersection of law, technology, and business. This year, LawTech.Asia had the unique privilege of interviewing John Edwards, Information Commissioner at the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (“UK ICO”). Commissioner Edwards also delivered a keynote address on the second day of TechLaw.Fest 2025, titled “Trust as Infrastructure: Can Regulation Be the Foundation for Responsible Innovation?”.

Drawing from his distinguished career in public service and private practice, Commissioner Edwards offered valuable perspectives on a range of pressing issues, including the regulation of emerging technologies, the geopolitical dimensions of artificial intelligence, and the evolving role of legal professionals in a rapidly changing landscape. Our discussion focused on the future of AI governance, cross-border legal complexities, and the pivotal contribution of young legal minds to shaping the future of law and technology.

Peng Huijuan: An Adaptive Framework for Regulating AI Inspired by Evolutionary Economics

Reading time: 7 minutes

Written by: Peng Huijuan

Introduction

Artificial intelligence (“AI“) has become a transformative force across a range of industries, including healthcare, finance, education, transportation, and entertainment. Its ability to analyse large datasets, automate complex processes, and enhance decision-making has revolutionised these sectors. However, the rapid pace of AI development has outpaced the capacity of existing legal frameworks to provide effective regulation, leading to significant regulatory gaps and uncertainties. These gaps not only hinder innovation but also fail to address critical societal concerns, including privacy, ethical use, and accountability (Calo, 2017). This regulatory lag, often referred to as the “pacing problem,” describes the growing disconnect between the rapid progression of emerging technologies and the slower evolution of the legal and ethical frameworks required to govern them (Marchant, 2011). 

Traditional regulatory approaches, typically rigid and slow to adapt, are ill-suited to rapidly evolving technologies like AI. As a result, there is an urgent need for a novel regulatory paradigm that can keep pace with technological advancements while preserving legal certainty and protecting societal interests. This paper introduces the Evolved AI Regulation Framework (“EARF“), an adaptive regulatory model inspired by evolutionary economics. EARF integrates the principles of variation, selection, and retention with inclusive stakeholder engagement, ethical alignment, and global coordination. By adopting this adaptive approach, the EARF aims to create a regulatory environment that evolves alongside with AI technologies, fostering innovation while safeguarding public interests and societal values.

ALITA gears up for launch of State of Legal Innovation in Asia-Pacific Report 2025

Reading time: 2 minutes

Introduction

The Asia-Pacific Legal Innovation and Technology Association (“ALITA“) will be launching the 2025 edition of the State of Legal Innovation in Asia-Pacific (“SOLIA“) Report at TechLaw.Fest 2025 on 10 September 2025.

ALITA is Asia-Pacific’s premier non-profit legal innovation and technology association, launched at TechLaw.Fest 2019 in Singapore. The inaugural SOLIA Report was launched at Stanford CodeX FutureLaw 2019 by the Singapore Academy of Law. This was followed by the 2020 edition of the SOLIA Report, which was launched in conjunction with the Singapore Management University School of Law with an expanded coverage.

What the SOLIA Report 2025 will contain

Page 1 of 31

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén