Asia's Leading Law & Technology Review

Author: Josh Lee Page 1 of 12

CLOC Global Institute – major announcements expected

Reading time: 2 minutes

Written by Josh Lee

LawTech.Asia is proud to be an official media partner of the CLOC Global Institute, an online event that focuses on outstanding educational content for legal operations and the business of law. It will see esteemed speakers like Adam Becker, CLOC Vice-President and Anushree Bagrodia, Vice-President at Mastercard, speaking on such topics as growing the influence of legal operations, planning for 2021, and using legal operations to increase diversity and inclusivity.

LawTech.Asia has also been receiving exclusive updates from CLOC, and we understand that as a body and a movement, CLOC intends to shift its focus from in-house professionals to embrace its identity as a global community focused on redefining the business of law. “The wording was intentional,” CLOC President Mary O’Carroll says. “It is more than just in-house legal departments and teams. It is about transformation”.

While more details are expected at CLOC Global Institute, which will be happening in a few short hours, we understand that CLOC intends to leverage scale to solve problems collectively. This means shifting CLOC’s global and long-term strategy, and scaling up its organisational infrastructure, to gather voices perspectives and resources to answer global questions, and to allow individuals to find support, resources and networks to find answers to the global disruptive challenges facing us. Ostensibly, this means bringing in new entrants, new technology firms and new law firms onto the CLOC table.

When asked about how CLOC intended to facilitate conversations between groups of stakeholders who often talk at cross-purposes or, by dint of culture, find it challenging to build understanding, Mary was hopeful: “We must first start with opening the conversation, and we are here to learn through that expansion. It has always been in our DNA to take risks and try. The important thing is not be an echo chamber, and to build conversations that can be rich and engaging. There may be difficulties in communicating, but I believe that creates a learning and teachable opportunity that CLOC is uniquely positioned to bring.”

Greater collaboration is always helpful and appreciated, but the devil, as always, lies in the detail. LawTech.Asia will be here to provide more clarity as CLOC makes a more detailed announcement at the 2020 edition of CLOC Global Institute.

Smart contracts and blockchain-based crowdsourced arbitration: A primer

Reading time: 11 minutes

Written by Tomoe Suzuki (Associate Author) | Mentored by Amelia Chew | Reviewed by Paul Neo 

LawTech.Asia is proud to conclude the second run of its Associate Author (Winter 2019) Programme. The aim of the Associate Authorship Programme is to develop the knowledge and exposure of student writers in the domains of law and technology, while providing them with mentorship from LawTech.Asia’s writers and tailored guidance from a well-respected industry mentor.

In partnership with the National University of Singapore’s alt+law and Singapore Management University’s Legal Innovation and Technology Club, five students were selected as Associate Authors. This piece by Tomoe Suzuki, reviewed by industry reviewer Paul Neo (Chief Operating Officer, Singapore Academy of Law), marks the third thought piece in this series. It examines the rise of blockchain-based crowdsourced arbitration platforms.


An earlier piece on “A brief analysis of the legal validity of smart contracts in Singapore” (“A Brief Analysis) by Louis Lau on LawTech.Asia has explored the issues surrounding the adoption of smart contacts in terms of validity. This piece seeks to build on the aforementioned piece and add on to readers’ understanding of issues that arise in the implementation of these contracts and solutions that have arisen. 

In particular, this article will compare various dispute resolution methods such as court-based litigation, mediation, arbitration (administered by arbitral institutions) to blockchain-based crowdsourced arbitration platforms (“BCAPs”) that have emerged in recent years. This piece will also provide a relatively abstract overview of how BCAPs work, the use cases they may be suited for, and highlight some of the challenges faced in increasing the adoption of smart contracts and BCAPs. 

How to Choose the Right Contract Management Software for You

Reading time: 6 minutes

Written by Alison Wilkinson

Contracts are an essential part of any legal office. If your law practice drafts contracts, conducts due diligence or does compliance work on behalf of your clients, you likely process hundreds, if not thousands, of contracts per year.

If they lack contract management software, many legal offices will instead store their contracts on secured shared drives like Google or Sharepoint. Using a secured shared drive is a step up from storing contracts in filing cabinets, but it’s inefficient. Contracts remain hard to access by multiple people, and it’s cumbersome to assign management and authorship duties.

With inefficiencies and management issues come errors. The International Association for Contract and Commercial Management estimates that the average company loses more than 9 percent of its revenue annually due to contract-related issues. Further, firms can lose up to 40 percent of the value of a given deal due to inefficient contracting, according to an estimate by the professional services firm KPMG.

Contract management software helps eliminate value leaks and inefficiencies by providing centralized, organized access to all your firm’s contracts. The software can give your group the tools it needs to share contracts among coworkers securely, assign and manage assignments, analyze key terms, review contracts quickly and accurately, streamline and process results and keep track of important deadlines. It also frees up time for attorneys to do more strategic, high-value work and allows them to update contracts more regularly.

Staying in the loop about Lupl

Reading time: 5 minutes

Written by Lenon Ong and Elizaveta Shesterneva | Edited by Utsav Rakshit, Ong Chin Ngee and Josh Lee

An introduction to Lupl

In the last decade, the world has seen an explosion of legal technology products. However, hopes that these products would spur a new era of significantly increased productivity for law firms have not panned out. Across legal industries, the adoption of these product leaves much to be desired. 

The problem, as discovered by the founders of Lupl, lies in the digital fragmentation of these legal technology products. 

Enhancing the development of legal technology in the region with new leading initiatives from the Asia-Pacific Legal Innovation and Technology Association

Reading time: 5 minutes

ALITA marks first anniversary

The Asia-Pacific Legal Innovation and Technology Association (ALITA) has marked its first anniversary with a slew of initiatives to further promote the development and implementation of legal tech in the region. These initiatives were announced at the final day of TechLaw.Fest 2020 and include:

  • State of Legal Innovation in Asia-Pacific (SOLIA) Report 2020: The SOLIA Report was first published in 2019 at Stanford University’s Future Law Conference, and then at TechLaw.Fest 2019. Building on these successes, the SOLIA 2020 Report contains several substantive improvements. These include covering new jurisdictions like Brazil, Indonesia and New Zealand, featuring updates from four regional law firms (Clifford Chance, Linklaters, Rajah & Tann and White & Case), and covering the impact that COVID-19 has brought to this sector. Much like a kaleidoscope, the SOLIA 2020 Report was made possible by contributors across APAC, and published in conjunction with the Singapore Management University School of Law, whose academic expertise was instrumental in putting the Report together. The Report may be accessed at
  • Legal Innovation Strategy Toolkit and Legal Technology White Paper: Launched on the basis that legal innovation flourishes best with a whole-of-jurisdiction approach, the Legal Innovation Strategy Toolkit is a first-of-its-kind document that seeks to advance legal innovation regionally by providing guidance on creating a coordinated jurisdictional-level legal innovation strategy. It is accompanied by a Legal Technology White Paper that, with ALITA’s regional perspective, provides an overview of adopting legal innovation through a coordinated effort with the aid of practical and illustrative examples to mobilise action. Both the White Paper and Toolkit are intended to be guiding documents. They do not instruct; rather, they share ideas in the hopes that these are useful and instructive. They are also “living” documents, which will be evolved in line with technological, industry and societal developments. The Toolkit may be accessed at
  • ALITA Legal Tech Observatory: ALITA’s Legal Tech Observatory is the world’s first regulatory observatory for legal technology. Modelled after the OECD AI Observatory and the EU Blockchain Observatory, the ALITA Legal Tech Observatory provides a real-time database of legal tech players and initiatives in the Asia-Pacific. It will be a hub for actionable insights for jurisdictions and industries, with input from a broad spectrum of legal tech actors. At the heart of the Observatory will be an extensive directory of players in the APAC legal tech ecosystem. It will give viewers a clear picture of the vibrancy of the legal tech ecosystem in the APAC region. It also seeks to complement the SOLIA Report 2020 by allowing viewers to draw actionable insights through data dissected by jurisdiction, market research, technology and other categories. It will also house ALITA’s other initiatives, like the SOLIA Reports series and the Legal Innovation Strategy Toolkit. The Observatory may be accessed at   
  • APAC’s Aspirations for Legal Innovation and Technology: Closing off TechLaw.Fest 2020 will be an APAC-wide open ideation project to determine and unite common aspirations and hopes for legal innovation and technology for the region. Tapping on ALITA’s convening power to encourage coordination and cooperation in legal innovation, the session will give participants a say in identifying the region’s aspirations, concerns and imperatives for legal innovation and technology, based on statement submissions from TechLaw.Fest attendees over the 5 days of TechLaw.Fest. These aspirations will go on to inform and guide ALITA’s continuing work for the region.

Capping off an eventful year

The launch of these initiatives caps off an eventual year for ALITA, notes the chairperson of its Steering Committee, Mr Josh Lee Kok Thong. He said:

Notwithstanding global disruptions, we have continued to support our members and stakeholders in the region, and topped it off by launching three signature initiatives. This is a testament to the power of regional collaboration, and a reflection of the continuously strengthening case for legal innovation.

Nevertheless, as a one-year old organisation, there remains much more that ALITA can and will do. As this is a space for collaboration, not competition, we look forward to building closer bridges and partnerships with our member organisations and regional partners to further legal innovation and opportunities for the region.”


The Asia-Pacific Legal Innovation and Technology Association (ALITA) is a pan-regional platform promoting the development and implementation of legal technology and innovation throughout the region. Incorporated in Singapore, ALITA has come into its own in the span of just one year, growing to a 160-member body strong organisation covering over 20 jurisdictions. These organisations include top global law firms White & Case, Clifford Chance, Dentons Rodyk, Rajah & Tann and Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, as well as multinational companies like Lazada and LexisNexis, as well as a host of legal technology players in the region. It is led by a group of regional changemakers and advised by a Board of top international thought leaders (see Annex).

With a focus on establishing its foundations, ALITA has also built-up its capabilities and repertoire of initiatives to help the region embrace and further legal innovation in a spirit of collaboration. Notwithstanding a disruptive year characterised by COVID-19, It has formed the ALITA Secretariat, an executive body comprising future legal tech eagles from law schools in Singapore, and built bridges with regional partners Rajah & Tann and Regit. It launched an in-house livestreaming capability for legal innovation content, called ALITALivestream – which was then used to livestream a Virtual Summit on legal tech in COVID-19 organised in collaboration with the Financial Times x Global Legal Hackathon event. It was also instrumental in the development of the Global Legal Tech Report (Asia) by Alpha Creates. 

Membership for ALITA is open to all organisational stakeholders in the legal innovation and technology sector in APAC. Details for membership can be found on ALITA’s website at

Annex: Board of Advisors and Steering Committee Members of ALITA

Board of Advisors

  1. Justice Lee Seiu Kin, Supreme Court Judge of Singapore [Chairperson]
  2. Andrew Arruda, Co-Founder, ROSS Intelligence
  3. Ahmad Fikri Assegaf, Senior Partner and Co-Founder, Assegaf Hamzah & Partners
  4. Professor Goh Yihan, Dean, Singapore Management University School of Law
  5. Komal Gupta, Head of AI & Innovation, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
  6. Dr Mimi Zou, Co-Founder, Oxford University Deep Tech Dispute Resolution Lab 
  7. Paul Neo, Chief Operating Officer, Singapore Academy of Law
  8. Terri Mottershead, Director, Centre for Legal Innovation

Steering Committee

  1. Josh Lee Kok Thong, Co-Founder, LawTech.Asia [Chair]
  2. Lee Ji En, Chapter Organiser, Legal Hackers Singapore; Member, Oxford Deep Tech Dispute Resolution Lab [Deputy Chair]
  3. Adeline Chin, Founder & CEO, Cyrus Creative Solutions
  4. Aidan Goh, Singapore Management University School of Law
  5. Andrew Wong, Product and Project Manager, Dentons Rodyk
  6. Anton Pronin, Director for Legal Technology, Skolkovo Foundation
  7. Brian Tang, Founding Executive Director, LITE Lab@HKU; Managing Director, ACMI; Chapter Organiser, Legal Hackers Hong Kong
  8. Jennifer Lim Wei Zhen, Co-Founder, LawTech.Asia; Associate, Shook Lin & Bok
  9. Kanan Dhru, Justice Innovation Researcher, Hague Institute for Innovation of Law
  10. Narae Lee, Representative and Lawyer, Bliss Law Offices
  11. Maurice L. Rabb, Senior Manager, Recruitment, Baker McKenzie
  12. Tony Lai, Creative Consultant, DSIL Global
  13. Wan Ding Yao, Co-Founder, LawTech.Asia; Singapore Management University School of Law

Featured Image Credit: Asia Pacific Cities Summit

Page 1 of 12

© LawTech.Asia